segunda-feira, 18 de setembro de 2017

Millennium Chess Genius Pro – primeira derrota

Após o confronto com Elite versão 11 com uma vitória e um empate, Millennium Chess Genius Pro não resistiu ao Shredder v. 11.74, engine presente no Ressurrection II 32 bits.




Games
[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.09.07"] [Round "?"] [White "Shredder v. 11.74"] [Black "Millenium Chess Genius Pro"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C18"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "129"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. Qg4 O-O 8. Bd3 Qa5 9. Bd2 f5 {[%emt 0:00:07] C18: French: 3 Nc3 Bb4: Main line: h4 and 7 Qg4} (9... Nbc6 10. Nf3 f5 11. exf6 Rxf6 12. Qh5 Nf5 13. Ne5 c4 14. Bxf5 Rxf5 15. Qe8+ Rf8 16. Nxc6 bxc6 17. Qxc6 Rb8 18. O-O {0-1 (58) Topalov,V (2735) -Ponomariov,R (2718) Leon 2003}) 10. exf6 Rxf6 11. Nf3 {LiveBook: 5 Games. Strongly threatening c4.} h6 {[%eval 105,19]} (11... Nbc6 $11 {[%eval 26,18] remains equal.}) 12. Qh5 $1 $16 {[%cal Rh5e8] [#] Qe8+ is the strong threat.} Bd7 13. O-O {[%eval 4,20]} (13. Ne5 $16 {[%eval 127,19]}) 13... c4 $1 $11 { [%cal Rc4d3]} 14. Be2 Nbc6 15. Qg4 $146 ({Predecessor:} 15. Rfb1 Qc7 16. Ne5 Nxe5 17. Qxe5 {1/2-1/2 (41) Escobar Forero,A (2469)-Mosquera, M (2375) Pamplona 2012}) 15... Qc7 16. Qg3 Qxg3 17. fxg3 Raf8 18. g4 b6 19. g5 hxg5 20. Bxg5 Rf5 21. g3 {[%cal Bg2g3,Bg3g4][%mdl 32]} Ng6 22. Rad1 Kh8 {[%eval 46,22]} (22... e5 $11 {[%eval 4,20]} 23. g4 R5f7) 23. h4 $14 {[%cal Bh2h4,Bh4h5][%mdl 32]} Kg8 24. h5 Nge7 {[%eval 81,22]} ({Black should play} 24... e5 $1 $14 { [%eval 31,24]} 25. hxg6 e4) 25. Kg2 $16 Be8 26. g4 R5f7 27. Rh1 Kh8 {[%eval 117,20]} (27... Nc8 $14 {[%eval 61,21]}) 28. h6 {aiming for hxg7+.} Ng8 29. hxg7+ Kxg7 30. Kg3 Bd7 31. Be3 Rf6 {[%eval 113,20]} (31... Kg6 $14 {[%eval 70, 17]}) 32. Rh2 {Hoping for Rdh1.} Be8 {[%eval 176,22]} (32... Nh6 $16 {[%eval 110,19]} 33. Rdh1 Nf7) 33. g5 $36 {[%mdl 2048] White is on the roll.} Rf5 34. Rdh1 {[#] Threatens to win with Rh7+.} Bg6 35. Nh4 Nge7 36. Bg4 (36. Nxf5+ Nxf5+ 37. Kf3 Nfxd4+ 38. Kg3 Nb5 $11) 36... Rh8 {[%eval 288,24]} (36... Bh7 $142 {[%eval 193,21]} 37. g6 (37. Nxf5+ Nxf5+ 38. Bxf5 Bxf5 $18) 37... Bxg6 38. Nxg6 (38. Nxf5+ Nxf5+ 39. Bxf5 Rxf5 $16) 38... Kxg6) 37. Nxf5+ Nxf5+ 38. Bxf5 Rxh2 39. Rxh2 ({Resist} 39. Kxh2 $6 Bxf5 40. Kg3 Nd8 $18) 39... Bxf5 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRB-KBN} 40. Bf4 Kf7 {[%eval 412,25]} (40... Kg8 $142 {[%eval 278,25]} 41. Rh6 Ne7) 41. Bd6 Kg8 42. Kf4 Kg7 {[%eval 532,24]} (42... Nd8 $142 {[%eval 372,23]} 43. Be5 Nf7) 43. Rh6 Bg6 44. Be5+ Kf7 45. Rh8 Bxc2 46. Rc8 Ne7 {[%eval 579,22]} (46... Nxe5 $142 {[%eval 401,23]} 47. Kxe5 Kg6 48. Rg8+ Kf7) 47. Rc7 {White is clearly winning.} Ke8 48. Rxa7 Ng6+ 49. Ke3 b5 50. Rb7 Ba4 51. Bd6 Kd8 52. Kd2 Ke8 53. Rg7 Nh4 54. Re7+ Kd8 55. Rh7 Ng6 56. Rg7 Nh4 57. g6 Nxg6 58. Rxg6 Kd7 59. Bb4 Bb3 60. Rg7+ Kc8 61. Re7 Ba2 62. Rxe6 Bb1 63. Rb6 Kc7 64. Rxb5 {Threatening mate with Bd6+!} Be4 65. a4 1-0

sexta-feira, 8 de setembro de 2017

Kasparov x Turbostar 432

A referencia que possuo deste jogo reside em uma simultânea de Kasparov com o s computadores de xadrez  ante uma reportagem da Chessbase.


Em 6 de junho de 1985, Garry Kasparov, de 22 anos, chegou a Hamburgo para fazer uma partida de preparação para a candidatura ao Campeonato do Mundo - e fazer uma entrevista extremamente crítica com uma importante revista de notícias alemã. Durante a visita, ele jogou uma simultânea contra 32 computadores de xadrez, talvez os  mais fortes à época.


Disse kasparov:

“Em algum momento, eu percebi que estava com problemas em um jogo contra um dos modelos de marca "Kasparov". Se esta máquina marcasse uma vitória ou até um empate, as pessoas seriam rápidas em dizer que eu joguei para promover a empresa, então eu tive que intensificar meus esforços. Eventualmente, encontrei uma maneira de "blefar" a máquina com um sacrifício duvidoso que qualquer computador de xadrez moderno poderia refutar em uma fração de segundo.”

foto extraída: http://www.chesscomputeruk.com/html/turbostar_432___kso.html


Games
[Event "Hamburg Spiegel sim comp"] [Site "Hamburg"] [Date "1985.??.??"] [Round "26"] [White "Kasparov, Garry"] [Black "Comp Turbostar 432"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2715"] [Annotator "Garry Kasparov"] [PlyCount "87"] [EventDate "1985.??.??"] 1. c4 e6 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 d5 4. Nf3 dxc4 5. O-O c6 6. a4 Be7 7. Qc2 Nbd7 8. Qxc4 Nb6 9. Qc2 Nfd5 10. Nc3 Nb4 11. Qd1 O-O 12. d4 a5 13. e4 Bd7 14. Qe2 Be8 15. Rd1 f6 16. Be3 Bh5 17. h3 f5 18. Bf4 Qd7 19. Re1 Bxf3 20. Bxf3 Bd6 21. Bxd6 Qxd6 22. Rad1 f4 23. g4 Rad8 24. Rd2 e5 25. d5 h6 26. Red1 c5 27. Qb5 Ra8 28. Qf1 Qd7 29. b3 c4 30. bxc4 Rac8 31. g5 Nxc4 {[#]After getting a fine position out of the opening, I drifted a little and the computer managed to get a small advantage. As you can see in the diagram the black knights are menacingly placed. After a passive move like Re2, the position would have been unpleasant but only slightly worse for White. Instead I decided to throw the machine off balance and sacrifice an exchange, which was objectively terrible but "psychologically" brilliant. At the time, it was understood by any strong player with experience versus computers that their main weakness was... tactics! In particular, combinations more than a few moves deep or involving pawn promotion, as the case here.} 32. Ra2 $2 {A terrible move, but not an oversight!} (32. Re2 $17 {White's position would not be so bad.}) 32... Nxa2 33. Nxa2 Qxa4 {Against any good human player, it should be all over, but...} 34. gxh6 Qxa2 {So far so good...} 35. Qg2 Rc7 36. d6 Rd7 (36... Rcf7 $19 { was better. But I was gambling that the computer would want more material instead of returning any.} 37. Bh5) 37. Bg4 Qb3 $4 {What a relief! It's all over now.} (37... Qa4 $1 $19 {This would have been much better but the computer back then did not realize that it was more important to defend d7 than to take on d1. I could still capture on d7 hoping it would blunder and take the rook with check instead of taking the bishop.}) 38. Bxd7 Qxd1+ 39. Kh2 {The mate on g7 is impossible to defend.} Rf7 40. Be6 Kf8 41. h7 $1 {The h-pawn queens.} Nxd6 42. h8=Q+ {My modern computer says 42.Qg5 is a faster mate, so pardon me for playing like a human.} Ke7 43. Bxf7 Nxf7 44. Qhxg7 { A slightly embarrassing escape for me, I admit, but one that nevertheless serves as an educational time capsule of the state of computer chess at the time. Despite this swindle and a few other weak computer efforts, I wouldn't want to diminish my own play entirely. Looking at all the games again, the computers rarely blundered and it required energy and precision to make a clean score against them on so many boards even 30 years ago.} 1-0

quinta-feira, 7 de setembro de 2017

Elite V11 x Millenium Chess Genius Pro

Elite não entende que a partida está empatada, sinalizando vantagem decisiva para as pretas.

Games
[Event "30 minutos"] [Date "2017.09.05"] [Round "?"] [White "Elite V11"] [Black "Millennium Chess Genius Pro"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "B33"] [PlyCount "173"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [SourceDate "2008.12.28"] 1. e4 c5 2. Ne2 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e5 6. Ndb5 d6 7. Nd5 Nxd5 8. exd5 Ne7 9. c3 Nf5 10. a4 a6 11. Na3 Be7 12. Bd3 O-O 13. O-O Bd7 14. Re1 Nh4 15. Qb3 Qc7 16. Be3 Bf5 17. Be2 Be4 18. f3 Bg6 19. Nc4 Rac8 20. Qb4 Nf5 21. Bf2 Ra8 22. a5 Rab8 23. Rad1 Nh6 24. Nxe5 dxe5 25. d6 Bxd6 26. Rxd6 Nf5 27. Rd2 Rfc8 28. Bd1 f6 29. Bb6 Qe7 30. Bb3+ Kh8 31. Qxe7 Nxe7 32. Red1 Re8 33. Ba4 Rg8 34. Rd7 Be8 35. Bb3 Bxd7 36. Rxd7 Nc6 37. Bxg8 Kxg8 38. Kf2 h5 39. Kg3 g6 40. b4 f5 41. Bc5 g5 42. Bd6 Rd8 43. Rxd8+ Nxd8 44. Bxe5 f4+ 45. Kf2 Kf7 46. Bc7 Ne6 47. Bd6 Kg6 48. Ke2 Kf5 49. Be7 g4 50. Kd3 Ke5 51. c4 Kf5 52. b5 gxf3 53. gxf3 Ke5 54. bxa6 bxa6 55. h4 Ng7 56. Bc5 Nf5 57. Bf2 Ne7 58. Bb6 Ng6 59. Bc7+ Ke6 60. Ke4 Nxh4 61. Kxf4 Kd7 62. Bb6 Ke6 63. Bf2 Ng6+ 64. Ke4 h4 65. f4 h3 66. Bg1 Ne7 67. Kf3 Kf5 68. Kg3 Nc6 69. Bh2 Nxa5 70. c5 Nc6 71. Bg1 Ke4 72. Kxh3 Kxf4 73. Bh2+ Ke4 74. Bc7 Kd5 75. Bb6 Ne5 76. Kg3 Nd3 77. Kf3 Nb2 78. Ke3 Nc4+ 79. Kd3 Ne5+ 80. Kc3 Nc6 81. Kd3 Nb8 82. Kc3 Nd7 83. Kb4 Kc6 84. Ka5 Nxb6 85. Kxa6 Nc8 86. Ka5 Na7 87. Kb4 1/2-1/2

quarta-feira, 6 de setembro de 2017

Elite V11 was unable to hold the Millenium Chess Genius Pro

Games
[Event "30 minutos"] [Date "2017.09.05"] [Round "?"] [White "Millennium Chess Genius Pro"] [Black "Elite V11"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D02"] [WhiteElo ""] [BlackElo ""] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "155"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 e6 4. Nf3 Bd6 5. O-O c5 (5... O-O 6. b3 Nbd7 7. Bb2 b5 8. Ne5 Bb7 9. c4 bxc4 10. bxc4 Rb8 11. Nxd7 Qxd7 12. c5 Ba6 13. Bc3 Be7 {1-0 (33) Burmakin,V (2508) -Bashirli,N (2349) Nakhchivan 2017}) 6. Nc3 {D02: 1 d4 d5 2 Nf3 sidelines, including 2...Nf6 3 g3 and 2...Nf6 3 Bf4} Nc6 7. Nb5 Be7 8. Bf4 {White has an edge.} O-O 9. c3 $146 {[%eval -47,20]} (9. c4 $11 {[%eval 13,18]}) ({ Predecessor:} 9. Ne5 Qb6 10. c4 Nxd4 11. Nxd4 cxd4 12. b3 dxc4 13. bxc4 Rd8 14. a4 {1/2-1/2 (23) Olsen,M (1976)-Kirknel,T (2160) Copenhagen 2013}) 9... a6 $15 10. Na3 $1 Qa5 11. Qc2 {[%eval -44,18]} cxd4 12. cxd4 Bxa3 {[%eval -5,18]} 13. bxa3 $11 Qxa3 14. Rab1 a5 15. Rb3 Qa4 16. Qb2 {[%mdl 1024] White has compensation.} Ne4 17. Rc1 f6 18. e3 Nb4 19. a3 Na6 $1 20. Bf1 $36 {[%mdl 2048] And now Bb5 would win. White has the initiative.} Qe8 21. Rb6 g5 {[%eval 63,22] } (21... Qd8 $11 {[%eval 16,20]}) 22. Bd6 $1 $14 {[%cal Rd6f8]} Nxd6 23. Rxd6 g4 24. Nd2 Nb8 {[%eval 132,20]} 25. Rc7 $16 Rf7 26. Rxf7 $1 Kxf7 27. Qc2 $1 { [%cal Rc2h7]} Kg8 28. Bb5 {[%eval 49,24]} Nc6 $1 $14 29. Bxc6 bxc6 30. Rxc6 Bd7 31. Rc7 Rc8 {[%eval 105,22]} 32. Nb3 $16 a4 33. Rxc8 $1 Bxc8 34. Nc5 Bd7 35. Qb1 Bc6 36. Qb6 h6 37. Qc7 h5 38. Nd3 Bb5 {[#]} 39. Nf4 $1 Ba6 40. Nxh5 { [%eval 54,22]} ({Better is} 40. Qd6 $16 {[%eval 116,21]} Bc8 41. Qc7) 40... Qxh5 $14 41. Qb8+ Kg7 {Hoping for ...Be2.} 42. Qa7+ Kh6 {...Be2 is the strong threat.} 43. Qxa6 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KQ-KQ} Qe8 {[%eval 130,22]} ({Black should play} 43... Qf5 $1 $14 {[%eval 61,23]}) 44. Kg2 Kg7 45. h4 gxh3+ 46. Kxh3 Qd7 47. g4 Kf8 48. Kg3 Qc7+ 49. Kg2 Qd7 50. f4 {Strongly threatening f5!} Ke8 $2 {[%eval 422,21]} 51. Kg3 {[%eval 187,22]} Kf8 $2 {[%eval 553,21] [#]} ( 51... Kf7 {[%eval 187,22]} 52. Qb6 Kg7) 52. Kf2 $2 {[%eval 186,19]} (52. f5 $1 {[%eval 553,21][%mdl 512]} Qc7+ (52... exf5 53. Qxf6+) 53. Kf3) 52... Ke7 53. Ke1 Ke8 {[%eval 222,21]} 54. Ke2 Kf7 55. Kd2 Ke7 56. Kc3 Qc7+ 57. Kb4 Qc2 $2 { [%eval 1624,16]} (57... Kf7 {[%eval 216,18]} 58. Qd3 (58. Qxa4 Qc4+ 59. Ka5 Qc7+ 60. Ka6 Qc8+ 61. Ka7 Qc7+ 62. Ka6 Qc8+ 63. Kb6 Qb8+ 64. Kc5 Qf8+ 65. Kb6 Qb8+ 66. Ka5 Qc7+ 67. Kb5 Qb8+ 68. Kc5 Qf8+ 69. Kb6 Qb8+ $11) (58. Kxa4 Qc2+ 59. Kb4 Qd2+ 60. Kc5 Qxe3 $16) 58... Qc6) 58. Qa7+ $18 Kd8 59. Qa5+ Ke7 60. Qc5+ Qxc5+ 61. dxc5 {KP-KP} e5 62. fxe5 fxe5 63. g5 d4 64. exd4 e4 65. d5 { White mates.} e3 66. Kc3 e2 67. Kd2 Kf8 68. c6 Ke7 69. g6 Kf6 70. c7 Kxg6 71. c8=Q Kg5 72. d6 Kf4 73. d7 Kf3 74. d8=Q e1=Q+ 75. Kxe1 Ke3 76. Qg5+ Kd3 77. Qd5+ Ke3 78. Qc1# 1-0



sábado, 2 de setembro de 2017

Dr. S x Novag Sapphire - game in 10

Games
[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.09.01"] [Round "?"] [White "Dr. S"] [Black "Novag Sapphire"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A56"] [WhiteElo ""] [BlackElo ""] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "85"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. d4 {[%cal Bd2d4,Bd4d5][%mdl 32]} c5 2. d5 d6 3. c4 Nf6 4. Nf3 e5 5. Nc3 Qa5 $146 ({Predecessor:} 5... g6 6. e4 Bg7 7. Be2 O-O 8. Bg5 h6 9. Bh4 Nbd7 10. O-O g5 11. Bg3 Nh5 12. Nd2 Nf4 13. Bg4 Bf6 14. Rb1 Kg7 15. f3 h5 16. Bf5 Rh8 17. Bf2 Qf8 18. Qc2 Bd8 19. g3 Ng6 20. Nd1 Ne7 { 1/2-1/2 (59) Markowski,T (2575)-Weiss,C (2361) Germany 2017}) 6. Bd2 {A56: Czech Benoni} Nbd7 7. e4 Be7 8. Be2 {White is better.} O-O 9. O-O Re8 10. h3 h6 11. Nh2 {[%eval 65,19]} (11. Nh4 $16 {[%eval 109,19]}) 11... Qa6 12. f4 { [%eval 13,20]} (12. a4 $16 {[%eval 85,20]}) 12... Bd8 {[%eval 80,19]} (12... exf4 $1 $11 {[%eval 13,20] remains equal.} 13. Bxf4 Bd8) 13. f5 $1 $16 Ba5 { White should prevent ...Bxc3.} 14. Bd3 Rb8 15. Qf3 (15. Qe2 {keeps more tension.} Qb6 16. a3 a6 17. Rfc1 Qc7 18. Rab1) 15... Qb6 16. Rab1 Bxc3 17. Bxc3 Qa6 18. a3 Nb6 19. Qe2 Bd7 20. g4 {[%eval 91,18]} (20. Be1 $142 {[%eval 144,19] }) 20... Ba4 {[%eval 134,20]} (20... Nh7 $142 {[%eval 91,18]} 21. b3 Na8) 21. b4 {[%eval 91,19]} (21. b3 $142 {[%eval 134,20]} Bd7 22. h4) 21... Bd7 { [%eval 141,17]} (21... Nbd7 $142 {[%eval 91,19]}) 22. Bb2 {[%eval 24,18]} (22. Bd2 $16 {[%eval 141,17]}) 22... Na4 $1 $11 23. b5 $1 {[%cal Rb5a6]} Qa5 { [%eval 83,19]} ({Black should play} 23... Qb6 $14 {[%eval 31,21]}) 24. h4 { [%eval -2,19]} (24. Bc1 $1 $16 {[%eval 83,19]}) 24... a6 25. g5 Nxb2 26. Qxb2 { [%eval -32,18]} ({Much less strong is} 26. Rxb2 $6 hxg5 27. hxg5 Nh7 $18) ({ White should try} 26. gxf6 $14 {[%eval 69,16]} gxf6 27. Rxb2) 26... hxg5 27. hxg5 Nh5 {Threatens to win with ...axb5.} 28. bxa6 Qxa6 29. f6 {[%eval -76,18]} (29. Nf3 $1 $15 {[%eval -33,18]}) 29... gxf6 $2 {[%eval 174,17]} (29... Ra8 $17 {[%eval -76,18] keeps the pressure on.} 30. fxg7 (30. Qxb7 Red8 $15) 30... Kxg7 ) 30. gxf6 $2 {[%eval -93,19]} ({White must play} 30. Qe2 $1 $18 {[%eval 174, 17][%cal Re2h5]} Ng3 31. Qg2) 30... Kf8 $2 {[%eval 1847,20][%mdl 8192]} (30... Kh7 $17 {[%eval -93,19]} 31. Nf3 Rg8+ 32. Kf2 Nxf6) 31. Qg2 Qxa3 32. Rf3 { Strongly threatening Qg5.} Nxf6 33. Rxf6 $2 {[%eval 256,19]} (33. Qg5 {[%eval 986,14]} Re6 34. dxe6 Bxe6 35. Qxf6) 33... Qxd3 $18 34. Rbf1 $40 {[%csl Gf1] [%cal Rf6f7][%mdl 128] White is out for blood.} Re7 $2 {[%eval 1247,17]} (34... Qe3+ {[%eval 215,22]} 35. R1f2 (35. Kh1 Ke7 $18) 35... Ke7 36. Rxf7+ Kd8) 35. Qg5 {[%eval 565,19]} (35. Qg6 $142 {[%eval 1247,17][%cal Rf6f7]} Qe3+ 36. Kh1) 35... Qd4+ 36. Kh1 Qxe4+ {[#]} 37. R1f3 $2 {[%eval 0,20]} (37. Nf3 $1 $18 { [%eval 215,19]} Qg4 38. Qh6+ Qg7 39. Qh4) 37... Qb1+ $2 {[%eval 423,16][%mdl 8192] [#]} (37... Ra8 $1 $11 {[%eval 0,20]} 38. Qh6+ Kg8) 38. Rf1 $2 {[%eval 21,20]} (38. Nf1 $1 $18 {[%eval 423,16] White wants to mate with Rh6.} Qe4 39. Qh6+ Kg8 40. Kg1 Qd4+ 41. Ne3 Qa1+ 42. Kh2 Qa2+ 43. Rf2) 38... Qh7 $2 {[%eval 1873,16][%mdl 8192]} (38... Qe4+ $11 {[%eval 21,20]} 39. R1f3 Ra8 40. Qh6+ Kg8) 39. Rh6 Qg7 40. Rg6 {[%eval 547,23]} (40. Qh4 $142 {[%eval 1666,19]} f5 41. Rh8+ Qxh8 42. Qxh8+ Kf7 43. Qxb8 Re8 44. Qxd6 Re7 45. Rg1) 40... Qh8 41. Rh6 { [%cal Rh6h8]} Qg7 42. Rg6 $2 {[%eval 209,21]} (42. Qh4 {[%eval 1387,18] Intending Rh8+ and mate.} Re6 43. Rh8+ Qxh8 44. Qxh8+ Ke7 45. Qh4+ Ke8 46. Qh8+ Ke7 47. Qh4+ Ke8 48. Qh7) 42... Qh7 $2 {[%eval 482,19]} (42... Qh8 {[%eval 209, 21]} 43. Rh6 Qg7) 43. Rh6 $2 {[%eval 0,36]} (43. Qf6 $18 {[%eval 482,19]} Ke8 44. Rh6 Qe4+ 45. Nf3) 1/2-1/2

sexta-feira, 25 de agosto de 2017

Universal Chess Board trabalhando com impressora - Programa desenvolvido por G. Berger - Espanha












O programa permite configurar caso opte para operar com uma impressora térmica, fato que reduziria em muito o barulho. Impressora térmica Epson é a recomendada por G. Berger.






segunda-feira, 14 de agosto de 2017

Super Expert C x Mephisto Monte Carlo

Super Expert C comete um erro que não é do seu estilo, final de peões.




Games
[Event "30 minutos"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.08.13"] [Round "?"] [White "Novag Super Expert C"] [Black "Mephisto Monte Carlo"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D46"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "134"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. d4 c6 2. c4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. Nf3 Nbd7 6. Bd3 Bb4 {LiveBook: 112 Games} 7. cxd5 {D46: Semi-Slav: 5 e3 Nbd7 6 Bd3, Black avoids the Meran} (7. Bd2 O-O 8. O-O dxc4 9. Bxc4 Bd6 10. e4 e5 11. Bg5 exd4 12. Qxd4 Bc5 13. Qd2 Nb6 14. Bd3 Be7 15. h3 Nfd7 16. Bxe7 Qxe7 17. Rfe1 Nc5 18. Rf1 Ncd7 19. Rad1 Nc5 { 1/2-1/2 (19) Lenic,L (2569)-Gritsak,O (2519) Warsaw 2008}) 7... exd5 8. a3 $146 ({Predecessor:} 8. O-O O-O 9. a3 Bd6 10. b4 Re8 11. Bb2 Ne4 12. b5 Ndf6 13. h3 Nxc3 14. Bxc3 Ne4 {1/2-1/2 (41) Pal,P (2200)-Majeric,Z (2366) Zalakaros 2004}) 8... Bd6 9. O-O {White has an edge.} Nb6 10. e4 Nxe4 11. Nxe4 dxe4 12. Bxe4 Bg4 13. h3 Bxf3 14. Qxf3 O-O $1 15. Qh5 {[%eval -38,22]} (15. Re1 $11 {[%eval 21, 19]}) 15... h6 $2 {[%eval 138,20] [#]} (15... g6 $15 {[%eval -38,22]} 16. Qd1 Re8) 16. Qf5 $2 {[%eval -13,20]} (16. Bxh6 $1 $16 {[%eval 138,20][%mdl 512] aiming for Bg5.} gxh6 17. Qxh6) 16... g6 $11 17. Qf3 Re8 18. Qg4 {[%eval -104, 19] [#]} (18. Bc2 $11 {[%eval -14,20] keeps the balance.}) 18... Qd7 {[%eval -23,20]} ({Black should try} 18... h5 $1 $17 {[%eval -104,19][%cal Rh5g4]} 19. Qf3 Bc7) 19. Qxd7 Nxd7 20. Bf3 Kg7 21. Bd2 Nb6 22. Rfe1 Rad8 23. Ba5 Bc7 24. Kf1 f6 25. Rxe8 Rxe8 26. Re1 Rxe1+ 27. Bxe1 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KBB-KBN} Bf4 28. b3 Bd6 29. a4 Nd5 30. Bxd5 cxd5 {KB-KB} 31. g4 g5 32. f3 f5 33. Ke2 h5 34. gxh5 Kh6 35. h4 $2 {[%eval -187,27] [#]} (35. Ke3 $11 {[%eval -27,31] and White is okay.}) 35... g4 $1 $19 36. fxg4 {[%eval -272,24]} (36. Kf1 {[%eval -187,28] was worth a try.}) 36... fxg4 37. Kf1 Kxh5 38. Kg2 Be7 39. b4 Bf6 40. Bf2 Bxh4 41. Bxh4 {[%eval -1467,23]} (41. Bg1 $142 {[%eval -439,27]}) 41... Kxh4 {KP-KP} 42. a5 a6 43. Kh2 g3+ 44. Kg2 Kg4 45. Kg1 Kf3 46. Kf1 g2+ 47. Kg1 Ke4 {( -> ...Kf3)} 48. Kxg2 Kxd4 {K3P-KPP} 49. Kf3 Kc3 {And now ...d4 would win.} 50. b5 axb5 {KP-KP} 51. Ke2 {Black mates.} b4 52. Kd1 b3 53. Kc1 d4 54. a6 bxa6 55. Kd1 d3 56. Ke1 b2 57. Kf2 b1=Q 58. Kf3 d2 59. Kf4 a5 {[%cal Ba6a5, Ba5a4,Ba4a3][%mdl 32]} 60. Ke5 a4 61. Kd6 a3 62. Ke5 d1=Q 63. Kf4 Qd4+ 64. Kf3 Qf1+ 65. Kg3 Qe3+ 66. Kg4 Qg2+ 67. Kf5 Qgg5# 0-1

sábado, 12 de agosto de 2017

Practical, small and beautiful - Monte Carlo and Academy, the brothers. Mephisto Monte Carlo (3) x Novag Super Nova (1) - dois jogos, 2 x 1

Para o Novag Super Nova:



(1.) se constitui na melhor linha de jogo encontrada por Novag Super Nova, no caso o movimento encontrado foi Ke2;
(2) [00:09] indica 9 segundos para a análise atual;
(3.) a valorização de [-4,40] por ser negativo é desfavorável ao Novag Super Nova 
(4.) d8 indica que Novag Super Nova está na oitava interação, indicando que analisa 4 movimentos para cada lado;
(5.) 0/5 significa que Novag Super Nova analisou 5 movimentos possíveis;





Games
[Event "30 minutos"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.08.12"] [Round "?"] [White "Novag Super Novag"] [Black "Mephisto Monte Carlo"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "B83"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "145"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be2 Be7 7. O-O Nc6 8. Be3 O-O 9. f4 Bd7 10. Nb3 {LiveBook: 288 Games} e5 {B83: Sicilian Scheveningen: 6 Be2, lines without ...a6} (10... a6 11. a4 Na5 12. Nd2 Rc8 13. Bd3 e5 14. Kh1 Ng4 15. Bg1 exf4 16. Nd5 Ne3 17. Nxe3 fxe3 18. Bxe3 Bg5 19. Bg1 Be6 {0-1 (39) Kulaots,K (2597)-Ladva,O (2530) Liepaja 2017}) 11. Qd2 Ng4 $146 {[%eval 108,19] } (11... exf4 $14 {[%eval 42,18]} 12. Rxf4 Ne5) ({Predecessor:} 11... exf4 12. Bxf4 Ne5 13. Rad1 Bc6 14. Bf3 Nxf3+ 15. gxf3 Nh5 16. Be3 Bh4 17. Kh1 Qf6 18. Nd4 {1-0 (59) Chan, S (1851)-Cobb,C (1346) Dos Hermanas 2004}) 12. Bxg4 $1 $16 Bxg4 {White is better.} 13. Nd5 {[%eval 47,18]} (13. f5 $1 $16 {[%eval 110,19]} Bh5 14. Nd5) 13... Rc8 {[%eval 110,17]} ({Better is} 13... exf4 $14 {[%eval 47, 18]} 14. Bxf4 (14. Rxf4 Be6 $14) 14... Re8) 14. h3 {[%eval 43,19]} (14. f5 $1 $16 {[%eval 110,17] Threatens to win with h3.} f6 15. c4) 14... Bh5 15. Nxe7+ { [%eval 22,19]} (15. f5 $16 {[%eval 81,17]} f6 16. c4) 15... Nxe7 $11 16. Bxa7 exf4 {[%eval 61,19]} ({Black should try} 16... b6 $1 $11 {[%eval -7,19]}) 17. Rxf4 $14 Qc7 {White must now prevent ...b6.} 18. Rh4 {[%eval 20,19]} (18. Bf2 $14 {[%eval 66,21] should be considered.}) 18... Bg6 $11 {Strongly threatening ... b6.} 19. Nd4 $2 {[%eval -248,19][%mdl 8192]} (19. Bf2 $11 {[%eval 20,21] and White stays safe.}) 19... b6 $19 20. Nb5 {[%eval -361,20]} (20. c4 { [%eval -248,19] keeps fighting.}) 20... Qc5+ $1 ({Weaker is} 20... Qxc2 21. Qxc2 Rxc2 22. b3 $15) 21. Nd4 Nc6 22. Bxb6 Qxb6 23. c3 Rfe8 24. Re1 Nxd4 25. cxd4 Rc4 26. Rd1 Bxe4 27. b3 Rcc8 28. Rf4 Qb5 29. Rc1 Rxc1+ 30. Qxc1 f6 31. Qb2 Kf7 32. Rf2 Kg6 33. a4 Qb4 34. Re2 Kf7 35. Kh2 {[%eval -545,18]} (35. Re3 $142 {[%eval -383,19]}) 35... Bd5 36. Rxe8 Kxe8 37. Qe2+ Kf8 38. Qg4 {intending Qc8+.} Bxb3 39. Qc8+ Ke7 $1 40. Qc7+ {[#]} Ke6 $1 41. Qxg7 Bc2 ({Resist} 41... Qxa4 42. Qg8+ Kd7 43. Qxh7+ Kc6 44. Qe4+ Kb5 45. h4) 42. Qg8+ Kd7 43. Qf7+ Kc6 44. Qe8+ {[#]} Kd5 $1 45. Qf7+ Kxd4 46. Qxf6+ Kc4 47. Qf1+ Kd5 $2 {[%eval 0,24] } (47... Kb3 $19 {[%eval -360,20]} 48. Qf7+ Ka3) 48. Qf7+ $11 Ke5 {aiming for . ..Qf4+.} 49. Qe7+ Kd4 {[%eval -117,18]} (49... Kd5 $11 {[%eval 0,27]} 50. Qf7+ Kd4) 50. Qf6+ $17 Kd3 51. Qf3+ Kc4 {Hoping for ...d5.} 52. Qf1+ Bd3 53. Qf4+ Kc5 54. Kg3 $2 {[%eval -840,16]} (54. Qc1+ {[%eval -310,17]} Qc4 55. Qa3+ Kc6 56. a5) 54... Qxf4+ $19 55. Kxf4 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KB-K3P} Kb4 56. g4 Kxa4 { KB-KPP} 57. h4 Kb4 58. g5 Kc5 59. h5 Kd4 60. g6 hxg6 {KB-KP} 61. h6 g5+ $1 62. Kxg5 Ke5 63. Kg4 Kf6 64. Kf4 Bf5 65. Ke3 Kg6 {( -> ...Kf6)} 66. h7 Kxh7 67. Kf4 Kg6 {[%cal Bh7g6,Bg6f6,Bf6e5,Be5e4][%mdl 32]} 68. Kf3 {Black mates.} Kf6 69. Ke2 d5 {[%cal Bd6d5,Bd5d4][%mdl 32]} 70. Ke3 Ke5 71. Ke2 Ke4 72. Kd2 d4 73. Kc1 0-1
Games
[Event "30 minutos"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.08.12"] [Round "?"] [White "Mephisto Monte Carlo"] [Black "Novag Super Nova"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C42"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "39"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 Bf5 (5... d5 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8. Nbd2 Nd6 9. c3 Bf5 10. Be2 O-O 11. Qb3 Be6 12. Bd3 a5 13. Re1 Qd7 14. Nf1 Bf5 15. Bxf5 Nxf5 16. Bf4 {1/2-1/2 (24) Grischuk,A (2761) -Yu,Y (2753) Jiayuguan 2017}) 6. Nbd2 {[%eval 0,18] C42: Petroff Defence: 3 Nxe5 and unusual White 3rd moves} (6. Bd3 $14 {[%eval 61,18]}) 6... Nc6 $146 {[%eval 79, 18] [#]} (6... d5 $1 $11 {[%eval 0,18] keeps the balance.}) ({Predecessor:} 6... Be7 7. Bd3 d5 8. O-O O-O 9. Re1 Nd6 10. Bxf5 Nxf5 11. c3 Nc6 12. Ne5 Bd6 13. Nxc6 bxc6 {0-1 (36) Boden,D (1022)-Villanueva,V (873) LSS email 2008}) 7. Nxe4 {[%eval 30,17]} (7. d5 $1 $16 {[%eval 79,18][%cal Rd5c6]} Nxd2 8. Bxd2 (8. Qxd2 Ne5 $11) (8. dxc6 Nxf3+ 9. Qxf3 Qe7+ 10. Be3 Be4 $11)) 7... Bxe4 8. Bb5 { White is slightly better.} Be7 9. Qe2 {[%eval -4,20]} (9. d5 $14 {[%eval 38,20] } a6 10. Ba4) 9... d5 {[%eval 93,21]} (9... f5 $11 {[%eval -4,20]}) 10. Ne5 $16 Qd6 11. Bf4 $36 {[%mdl 2048] Strongly threatening f3. Black is under strong pressure.} Qf6 {[#]} 12. Nxc6 {[%eval 11,19]} (12. Qd2 $1 $16 {[%eval 103,18]}) 12... bxc6 $11 13. Be5 Qg6 14. Ba4 $1 Bxg2 $2 {[%eval 219,17]} (14... O-O $11 { [%eval 11,19] and Black stays safe.}) 15. Rg1 $18 {[%cal Bh1g1,Bg1g2,Bg2g7, Bg7h7][%mdl 32]} O-O {[%eval 333,18]} (15... Rb8 $142 {[%eval 235,19]} 16. O-O-O Rb4) 16. f4 Rfe8 $2 {[%eval 690,18]} (16... f6 {[%eval 206,20]}) 17. Rxg2 {White is clearly winning.} Qh6 {[#]} 18. Bxc6 $1 {[%mdl 512]} Qxc6 19. Rxg7+ Kf8 20. Rxh7 1-0

domingo, 6 de agosto de 2017

Mephisto Monte Carlo (1) x Novag Super Nova (0) - dois jogos, 1 x 1

Games
[Event "Rapido 30 minutos"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.08.03"] [Round "?"] [White "Mephisto Monte Carlo"] [Black "Novag Super Nova"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E91"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "160"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [EventType "rapid"] [SourceDate "2008.12.28"] 1. d4 d6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e4 Bg7 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Be2 O-O {LiveBook: 186 Games} 7. Bf4 {[%eval 27,19] E91: King's Indian: Classical: 6 Be2, unusual replies including 6...c5 and 6...Bg4} (7. d5 $16 {[%eval 74,20]} Nb8 8. O-O) ( 7. d5 Nb8 8. O-O Bg4 9. h3 Bxf3 10. Bxf3 c6 11. Bf4 Nbd7 12. Qd2 Rc8 13. b3 cxd5 14. exd5 a6 15. Rfc1 Qa5 16. a4 {1/2-1/2 (28) Mchedlishvili,M (2587) -Gagunashvili,M (2579) Tbilisi 2015}) 7... Qe8 8. Nd5 $146 {[%eval 2,22]} (8. O-O $14 {[%eval 48,20] deserves consideration.}) ({Predecessor:} 8. O-O e5 9. Be3 Nd7 10. d5 Ne7 11. Nb5 Qd8 12. Nxc7 f5 13. exf5 gxf5 14. Nb5 f4 {0-1 (34) Wang,O-Xing,E Brisbane 2006}) 8... Nxd5 9. cxd5 {The position is equal.} e5 10. dxe5 Nxe5 11. Nd4 {[%eval -52,20]} (11. O-O $11 {[%eval 2,21]}) 11... c6 { [%eval -8,20]} (11... f5 $15 {[%eval -52,20] might be stronger.} 12. exf5 Bxf5) 12. O-O $11 Bd7 13. Rc1 cxd5 {[%eval 73,18]} (13... c5 $11 {[%eval -21,18] keeps the balance.} 14. Nf3 f5) 14. exd5 $16 Rc8 15. Qb3 Ng4 16. Rce1 $36 { [%mdl 2048] White is really pushing.} Nxf2 {[%eval 150,20]} (16... Bxd4 $142 { [%eval 83,20]} 17. Bxg4 Be5) 17. Nb5 $1 {[%cal Rb5d6]} Ne4 {[%eval 238,19] [#]} (17... Qe4 $16 {[%eval 150,21]} 18. Bg3 (18. Rxf2 Bxb5 19. Qxb5 Bd4 $11) (18. Bxd6 Rfe8 $11) (18. Nxd6 $2 Qxf4 19. Qg3 Qd2 $19) 18... Nh3+ 19. Kh1 (19. gxh3 Bxb5 20. Qxb5 Bd4+ 21. Bf2 a6 $16) 19... Rc5) 18. Nxd6 {[%eval 133,22]} (18. Bd3 $1 $18 {[%eval 238,19]} Bxb5 19. Rxe4 Qxe4 20. Bxe4 Bd4+ 21. Be3 Bxe3+ 22. Qxe3 Bxf1 23. Kxf1) 18... Nxd6 19. Bxd6 Bd4+ {[%eval 253,20]} (19... Qd8 $16 { [%eval 135,20]}) 20. Kh1 $18 Bb6 $2 {[%eval 540,19]} (20... Qd8 {[%eval 211,19] }) 21. Qb4 $2 {[%eval 192,22]} (21. Bc4 {[%eval 540,19]}) 21... f5 $2 {[%eval 436,20]} (21... Qd8 {[%eval 192,22] was called for.}) 22. Bc4 (22. Bxf8 Qxf8 23. d6 Qf7 $18) 22... Qd8 {and if ...Ba5 works, Black does fine.} 23. Bxf8 Ba5 24. Qe7 {[%csl Gf8][%cal Re7g7]} Qxf8 25. Qxf8+ {[%eval 144,18]} (25. Qxd7 $6 Bxe1 26. b3 (26. Rxe1 Rxc4 27. h3 Re4 $16) 26... Bb4 $16) (25. Re2 $18 { [%eval 311,22] is more deadly.} Qxe7 26. Rxe7) 25... Kxf8 $16 26. Rc1 Ke7 {[#]} 27. Be2 {[%eval 110,21]} (27. d6+ $1 $18 {[%eval 175,20]} Kxd6 28. a3) 27... Rd8 28. Rfd1 Kd6 29. Bf3 Bb6 30. g3 g5 31. Re1 Bc8 {[%eval 120,20]} (31... f4 $14 {[%eval 70,19]}) 32. b4 Bd7 33. Bg2 {[%eval 53,21]} (33. Kg2 $16 {[%eval 95,19]}) 33... Bd4 34. Rc4 Bf2 35. Re2 Bb5 $2 {[%eval 285,23]} (35... b5 $16 { [%eval 86,22] was necessary.}) 36. Re6+ $18 ({Inferior is} 36. Rxf2 Bxc4 37. Rxf5 Bxa2 $11) 36... Kd7 37. Rc2 Bb6 38. Rh6 Rh8 39. a3 Ba4 40. Re2 Bd1 { [%eval 433,20]} (40... Bd4 $142 {[%eval 307,20]} 41. d6 Rc8 42. Re7+ (42. Bxb7 Rc1+ 43. Kg2 Rg1+ 44. Kf3 Rf1+ 45. Kg2 Rg1+ 46. Kh3 Bb5 $11) 42... Kd8) 41. Re1 Bb3 42. d6 Bd8 43. Bxb7 Bf7 44. Rc1 {Threatens to win with Bc6+.} Bg6 45. Bc8+ Kxd6 {[%eval 717,19]} (45... Ke8 $142 {[%eval 436,22]} 46. Be6 f4 47. gxf4 gxf4 ) 46. Bxf5 Rg8 47. Bxg6 hxg6 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRR-KRB} 48. Rc8 a6 49. Kg2 g4 50. Ra8 Kc6 51. Rxa6+ Bb6 52. a4 {[%cal Ba3a4,Ba4a5][%mdl 32]} Kb7 53. b5 Rg7 54. a5 Bd8 55. Kg1 g5 56. Rhd6 Bc7 57. Rd2 Re7 58. Rb2 Re4 59. Kf2 Ra4 { [%eval 786,21]} (59... Re5 $142 {[%eval 488,22]} 60. Rb4 Bd8) 60. Re6 Bxa5 61. b6 Rb4 62. Rxb4 Bxb4 {KR-KB} 63. Kf1 Bd2 64. Kg2 Ka6 65. Kh1 Kb7 66. Re2 Bc3 67. Re3 Bd2 68. Rd3 Ba5 69. Rd5 Bxb6 70. Rxg5 Be3 71. Rxg4 Kc6 72. Kg2 Kd6 73. Re4 Bc5 74. Kf3 Kd7 75. h4 {[%cal Bh2h4,Bh4h5,Bh5h6][%mdl 32]} Be7 {White mates.} 76. h5 Bg5 77. Kg4 Bh6 78. Kf5 Bg7 79. Re6 Bd4 80. h6 Bh8 1-0

Novag Super Nova x Mephisto Monte Carlo

Games
[Event "Rapido 30 minutos"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.08.03"] [Round "?"] [White "Novag Super Nova"] [Black "Mephisto Monte Carlo"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B30"] [WhiteElo "1922"] [BlackElo "1881"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "93"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [EventType "rapid"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 g6 4. Bc4 Bg7 5. O-O d6 6. d3 Nf6 7. Ng5 O-O { B30: Sicilian: 2...Nc6 3 Bb5, lines without ...g6} 8. f4 {LiveBook: 3 Games} Bg4 (8... h6 9. Nxf7 Rxf7 10. Bxf7+ Kxf7 11. f5 g5 12. Nd5 Bd7 13. h4 Qh8 14. c3 Nxd5 15. exd5 {0-1 (42) Kraai,J (2514)-Becerra Rivero,J (2547) ICC INT 2013} ) 9. Qe1 Nd4 {The position is equal.} 10. Rf2 {[%eval -47,20]} (10. Qf2 $11 { [%eval -1,18]}) 10... Nd7 $146 {[%eval 50,19]} (10... Bd7 $15 {[%eval -47,20]}) ({Predecessor:} 10... h6 11. Nh3 Qd7 12. Qf1 Nh5 13. Bd2 b5 14. Bd5 Rac8 15. a3 b4 16. Nb1 Nxc2 {0-1 (35) Lee,A (644)-Eade,D (1977) Auckland 2015}) 11. h3 $14 Be6 $1 12. Nxe6 Nxe6 13. Bd5 {[%eval 19,18]} (13. f5 $14 {[%eval 62,17] feels stronger.} Nc7 14. Be3) 13... Qb6 $11 14. f5 Nd4 $1 15. fxg6 hxg6 16. Bc4 e6 17. Nd1 Ne5 18. Ne3 Qd8 19. c3 Nxc4 20. Nxc4 d5 21. cxd4 {And now Ne5 would win.} dxc4 22. dxc4 cxd4 23. Bd2 Qc7 24. c5 {[%eval -103,19]} (24. Qf1 $15 { [%eval -57,19]}) 24... Rad8 25. Ba5 b6 ({Much weaker is} 25... Qxc5 $6 26. Rc1 $11) 26. cxb6 axb6 27. Rc1 Qa7 28. Bb4 Rfe8 29. a3 Qd7 30. e5 Rc8 {[%eval -14, 22]} (30... Qd5 $17 {[%eval -73,21]} 31. Bd6 d3) 31. Rd1 $1 Qd5 32. Bd6 Bh6 33. Kh2 {[%eval -123,19]} (33. Rf3 $1 $11 {[%eval 0,20]}) 33... Be3 {[%eval 0,21]} (33... f5 $1 $17 {[%eval -123,19]} 34. Qf1 Be3) 34. Rf3 Qc4 $2 {[%eval 173,20]} (34... Rc2 $11 {[%eval 0,21]} 35. Qg3 Qb7) 35. Qg3 {[%eval 33,21]} ({White has to play} 35. Qh4 $18 {[%eval 173,20] White wants to mate with Rxf7!} Qe2 36. Rxf7 $1 {[%mdl 512]}) 35... Red8 $2 {[%eval 242,21]} ({Black should try} 35... Qc2 $1 $14 {[%eval 33,21]} 36. Rdf1 Qe4) 36. Rdf1 $2 {[%eval 22,21]} (36. Qh4 $18 {[%eval 242,21] Threatening mate with Rxf7!} Rd7 37. Be7 Rxe7 38. Qxe7) 36... Rd7 37. Rf6 Qe2 38. b4 {[%eval -114,19]} (38. Qh4 $11 {[%eval 0,20] keeps the balance.} Qh5 39. Qe4) 38... Ra8 {[%eval 1,21]} (38... Qh5 $17 { [%eval -114,19]} 39. R6f3 Rc2) 39. a4 {[%eval -109,20] [#]} (39. Qh4 $11 { [%eval 1,21]} g5 40. Qh6) 39... Rb7 {[%eval 25,20]} (39... Qh5 $1 $17 {[%eval -109,20]} 40. Qe1 Rxa4) 40. Kh1 {[%eval -87,21]} (40. Qh4 $11 {[%eval 25,20]} Qc2 41. Rxf7 Rxf7 42. Rxf7) 40... Rc8 {Strongly threatening ... d3.} 41. b5 $2 {[%eval -237,21]} ({Better is} 41. Qh4 $15 {[%eval -57,20]}) 41... Ra8 $2 { [%eval 0,21]} (41... d3 $19 {[%eval -237,21]} 42. Qf3 Qxf3 43. R6xf3 d2 44. Rxe3 Rc1) 42. Bb4 {[%eval -150,19]} (42. Qh4 $11 {[%eval 0,21]} d3 43. Qe4) 42... Rxa4 $2 {[%eval 32758,19] [#]} (42... Qh5 $17 {[%eval -150,19]} 43. Ba3 Rxa4) 43. Rxg6+ $1 {[%cal Bf6g6,Bg6g7,Bg7h7,Bh7h6][%mdl 544] White mates.} Kh7 (43... fxg6 44. Qxg6+) 44. Rg7+ Kh6 45. Rf6+ Kh5 46. Rh7+ Bh6 47. Rhxh6# 1-0



sábado, 5 de agosto de 2017

Chess Size Guide by regencychess


Impossível não seguir as regras com relação a proporção das peças. Tenho insistido muito nisso, mas os absurdos são constantes. Este torneio estão jogando os melhores, mas as peças, vide o Rei, totalmente sem proporção. Este fato fica mais visível quando comparamos as peças dos dedicados. 






quarta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2017

Exclusive Millenium


Games
[Date "2017.08.02"] [White "tradechess"] [Black "Exclusive Millenium"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "D45"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "48"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 d5 4. e3 e6 5. Nf3 Nbd7 6. Be2 Bd6 7. O-O O-O 8. Qc2 Re8 9. Bd2 {LiveBook: 21 Games} Qc7 $146 {D45: Semi-Slav: 5 e3} ({Predecessor:} 9... b6 10. e4 Nxe4 11. Nxe4 dxe4 12. Qxe4 Bb7 13. Bc3 Nf6 14. Qh4 c5 15. dxc5 Bxc5 16. Rad1 {1/2-1/2 (16) Kempinski,R (2595)-Khenkin,I (2579) Germany 2002}) 10. h3 b6 11. Rac1 Bb7 12. cxd5 cxd5 {[%eval 97,21]} (12... exd5 $11 {[%eval 16,19] keeps the balance.} 13. Nb5 Qb8 14. Nxd6 Qxd6) 13. Qd3 {[%eval 48,20]} ({Better is} 13. Nb5 $16 { [%eval 97,21]} Qxc2 14. Rxc2) 13... Qb8 $14 14. Qb5 Rc8 15. Qb3 a6 16. a3 Rc6 17. Na2 Ne4 18. Bb4 Qc7 {[%eval 77,21]} (18... Bc7 $11 {[%eval 26,19]}) 19. Bxd6 Qxd6 20. Rxc6 Bxc6 21. Nb4 Bb7 22. Na2 Bc6 23. Nb4 Bb7 24. Na2 Bc6 { [%eval 43,22]} (24... Rc8 $11 {[%eval 0,20]}) 1/2-1/2

terça-feira, 1 de agosto de 2017

Algumas posições que poderiam ser reduzidas em empate



Games
[Event "Computer chess game"] [Site "Novag-Chessboard"] [Date "2017.08.01"] [Round "?"] [White "tradechess"] [Black "Novag Citrine"] [Result "*"] [ECO "D25"] [WhiteElo "2200"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "38"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 Bg4 5. Bxc4 e6 6. O-O Nbd7 7. Nc3 Bd6 { LiveBook: 45 Games} 8. Bd3 $146 {D25: Queen's Gambit Accepted: 4 e3: sidelines and 4...Bg4} ({Predecessor:} 8. h3 Bxf3 9. Qxf3 c6 10. Rd1 O-O 11. e4 e5 12. d5 Qe7 13. Bg5 h6 14. Bh4 g5 15. Bg3 c5 {1-0 (73) Swiercz,D (2631)-Delchev,A (2622) Haguenau 2013}) 8... O-O 9. e4 {[%eval -45,20]} ({White should try} 9. h3 $14 {[%eval 46,18]} Bh5 10. g4) 9... e5 {[%eval 18,20]} (9... c5 $15 { [%eval -45,20]} 10. e5 Bxf3 11. Qxf3 Bxe5) 10. d5 $11 Nc5 11. Bc2 a6 {[%cal Ba7a6,Ba6a5][%mdl 32]} 12. b4 {[%eval -61,21]} (12. Be3 $11 {[%eval 25,20]}) 12... Ncd7 {[%eval 10,22]} (12... Ncxe4 $1 $15 {[%eval -61,21]} 13. Nxe4 Nxe4 14. Bxe4 f5) 13. a3 a5 14. b5 Bc5 15. Bb2 Nb6 16. Qe2 {[%eval -50,19]} (16. h3 $11 {[%eval 23,19]} Bh5 17. Qd3) 16... Qe7 17. Na4 Nxa4 18. Bxa4 Rfd8 19. h3 Bh5 $11 *



Games
[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.08.01"] [Round "?"] [White "draw"] [Black "draw"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [Annotator "tradechess"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "8/1p3pk1/5p1p/p6P/5PP1/1P1r4/P3RK2/8 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "4"] {[#]} 1. Rc2 (1. Kg2 b5 2. Rc2 (2. f5 $11) 2... a4 $11 {[%eval 0,25]}) (1. f5 b5 (1... Rd4 2. Kf3 b5 $14 {[%eval 44,27]}) 2. Rb2 (2. Kg2 $11) 2... a4 $11 { [%eval 0,28]}) (1. Re7 b5 (1... Rd2+ 2. Kf3 Rxa2 $14 {[%eval 31,23]}) 2. Re2 a4 $11 {[%eval 0,25]}) 1... a4 (1... f5 2. gxf5 Rh3 $11 {[%eval 30,25]}) 2. bxa4 f5 $11 {[%eval 19,25]} 1/2-1/2

quarta-feira, 19 de julho de 2017

segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017

Conexão Super Expert com o programa CEboard

Conexão entre o Novag Super Expert e o programa CEboard. Sempre aproveito para fazer esta conexão, para testar meus Ipaqs antigos que ainda funcionam. O programa elaborado por Alain, colecionador vide CEboard por incrível que possa parecer ainda é ativo. Uma pena que não existem programas nesta modalidade para os celulares atuais.




vide a partida em game SEC x SEC

sábado, 8 de julho de 2017

Garry Kasparov returns to competition! - créditos a chessbase

chessbase.com - breaking-news

Qualquer notícia sobre Kasparov sempre causa atenção, mormente porque Kasparov sempre incentivou o desenvolvimento das máquinas e jamais teve receio de enfrentá-las.

Veja também em http://www.kasparov.com/ - novo livro Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins 1st Edition.




Printer with Elite v 7


Printer and interface developed by G. Berger, perfect, works with all fidelity machines that allows you to connect to printer. The delay in some moves was because I was consulting the opening repertory of chessbase and what I saw, fidelity has a vast repertoire of openings.

Well, let's say that when checking the opening repertoire, I left the pawn on e6 without defense! Bad move.











Collectors may ask, well, the printer is not original, anyway, other issues may arise. I answer, I respect that collector want to have all the main elements, packaging, manual, etc. But I'm worried about playing chess, learn from these machines, and in some cases it exceed 2000 elo. 
Just as I respect those who wish to have everything original, the reciprocal is true.

Colecionadores podem perguntar, bom, a impressora não é original, enfim, demais questões podem surgir. Eu respondo, respeito quem deseja possuir todos elementos principais, embalagem, manual, etc..Mas eu estou preocupado em jogar xadrez, aprender com estas máquinas, e em alguns casos chegam a superar 2000 de elo. Assim como respeito aqueles que desejam ter tudo original, a recíproca é verdadeira.