Novag Sapphire x Elite AG 2265

A pretensão é fazer uma série de 10 jogos, 20 minutos ou 30 minutos entre Novag Sapphire x EAG 2265. Nesta partida, EAG deve ficar feliz, pois segundo análises a partida estava ganha por Sapphire.

[Event "20 minutos"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Novag Sapphire"] [Black "Elite Avant Garde 2265"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "D20"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (14s)"] [PlyCount "110"] [SourceDate "2008.12.28"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e4 {[%cal Be2e4,Be4e5][%mdl 32]} Nf6 4. e5 Nd5 5. Bxc4 Nb6 6. Bb3 Nc6 7. Nf3 {LiveBook: 245 Games} f6 {[%eval 128,17] D20: Queen's Gambit Accepted: 3 e3 and 3 e4, ainda, difícil imaginar que f6 não tenha sifdo alvo de críticas pelo programa, um lance que ao meu ver não faz sentido algum, até onde posso avançar.} (7... Bg4 $14 {[%eval 33,19]}) (7... Bg4 8. Ng5 Bxd1 9. Bxf7+ Kd7 10. Be6+ Ke8 11. Bf7+ Kd7 {1/2-1/2 (11) Aleksandrov,A (2588) -Stupak,K (2586) Baku 2017}) 8. d5 $146 ({Predecessor:} 8. exf6 gxf6 9. O-O e5 10. Re1 Bg4 11. h3 Bh5 12. g4 Bf7 13. Bxf7+ Kxf7 14. dxe5 fxe5 {1-0 (28) Aas, O-Torfoss,B Norway 1998}) 8... Na5 9. Ba4+ c6 {White is slightly better.} 10. Nc3 e6 11. dxe6 {[%eval 34,20]} (11. d6 $16 {[%eval 106,18]}) 11... Bxe6 $14 12. O-O {[%cal Bh1f1,Bf1e1,Be1e6,Be6e4][%mdl 32] Nd4 is the strong threat.} Nxa4 $2 {[%eval 167,18]} (12... Qxd1 $11 {[%eval 11,19] and Black is okay.} 13. Bxd1 O-O-O) 13. Qxa4 $18 {[#] Hoping for Rd1.} fxe5 14. Nxe5 $2 {[%eval 27,20]} (14. Ng5 $18 {[%eval 186,18]} Bf5 15. Re1) 14... Qc7 $2 {[%eval 268,21]} (14... Bd6 $11 {[%eval 27,20]}) 15. Re1 Be7 $2 {[%eval 486,17]} (15... O-O-O {[%eval 271,20] keeps fighting.} 16. Bg5 Re8) 16. Nxc6 $2 {[%eval 66,19]} ({Better is} 16. Nf3 $18 {[%eval 486,17]}) 16... Qxc6 $14 17. Rxe6 Qxa4 18. Nxa4 {aiming for Bg5.} Kf7 19. Re4 Bf6 20. Bf4 {[%eval 27,21]} (20. Bd2 $16 {[%eval 77,19]} Nc6 21. Rae1) 20... b5 {[%eval 88,20] [#]} (20... Rhe8 $11 {[%eval 27,21] keeps the balance.} 21. Nc3 Bxc3 22. Rxe8 Rxe8 23. bxc3 Re2) 21. Nc3 $1 $16 Bxc3 22. bxc3 Rhe8 23. Rae1 Rxe4 24. Rxe4 $14 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRB-KRN} Rc8 25. Rd4 {Strongly threatening Rd7+.} Re8 {[%eval 104,22]} (25... Rxc3 $14 { [%eval 61,21] is superior.} 26. Rd7+ Ke6 27. Rxa7 (27. Rxg7 Ra3 $11) 27... Ra3) 26. Kf1 (26. g3 {is more complex.} a6 27. Kg2 Kf6 28. Rd6+ Re6 29. Bg5+) 26... Nc6 27. Rd7+ Re7 28. Rxe7+ (28. Rd5 {feels hotter.} Re4 29. Be3 a6 30. Rc5 Ne7 31. Bd4) 28... Kxe7 $16 {KB-KN} 29. Ke2 Ke6 30. Kd3 Kd5 31. a4 {[%eval 13,26]} ({White should try} 31. Bc7 $16 {[%eval 84,23]}) 31... bxa4 $11 32. c4+ Kc5 33. Kc3 $1 g6 34. Bh6 Kb6 35. Be3+ Ka5 36. Bc5 a6 {[%eval 104,27]} (36... Ka6 $14 { [%eval 37,26]}) 37. Ba3 {[%eval 39,25]} (37. h3 $16 {[%eval 104,27]}) 37... g5 38. h3 h5 39. Bc5 (39. f3 {with more complications.} Nd8 40. Be7 Nf7 41. g3 Kb6 42. Kb4) 39... g4 {[%eval 213,27]} (39... Nd8 $16 {[%eval 75,26] was necessary. }) 40. hxg4 hxg4 41. Bf8 $2 {[%eval 4,28]} (41. f3 $18 {[%eval 198,27]}) 41... Kb6 {The position is equal.} 42. Bd6 Ka7 43. Kb2 Na5 44. c5 Kb7 45. Ka3 Kc6 46. Kxa4 Nb7 47. Kb4 (47. Bf8 {keeps more tension.} Nxc5+ 48. Bxc5 Kxc5 49. Ka5 Kd5 50. Kxa6 Kc6 51. Ka5) 47... Nxd6 48. cxd6 Kxd6 {KPP-KPP} 49. Ka5 Kd5 50. Kxa6 { KPP-KP} Kd4 51. Kb6 Kd3 52. f4 {Threatening mate with f5.} gxf3 $1 53. gxf3 Kd4 54. f4 Ke4 55. Ka7 Kxf4 {Precision: White = 32%, Black = 37%.} 1/2-1/2